AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Merrick garland school board memo2/19/2023 Previously released internal NSBA emails obtained by Parents Defending Education through open-records requests include one in which Mr. Garland has not rescinded the memo, saying it was aimed at countering “violence or threats of violence,” not chilling debate over school policies. Garcia, which prompted 19 state chapters to take steps to withdraw membership, participation or dues, according to PDE.Įven so, Mr. You should resign in disgrace, Judge." NSBA board disavowed the letter signed by Mr. We are only trying to prevent violence against school officials.Ĭomplete exchange between and Attorney Merrick General Garland on school board memo.Ĭotton concludes: "Thank God you are not on the Supreme Court. So parents can object to school boards about curriculum, about the treatment of their children, about school policies, all of that is 100 percent protected by the First Amendment, and there is nothing in this memorandum contrary to that. As long as there are no threats of violence, they are completely protected. They are protected by the First Amendment. This memorandum is not about parents being able to object in their school boards. There is nothing in this memorandum, and I wish if senators are concerned about this, they would quote my words. They were other news reports that everybody here has heard about, subsequent reports that everybody has heard about. The news reports I was talking about are not the news reports in that letter. I wasn’t sure if there was a question there, but let me be clear. Garland was then given time to have the last word in the exchange. Garland responded: “Senator, anyone whose child was raped – the most horrific crime I can imagine – is certainly entitled and protected by the First Amendment to protest to their school board about this.” Garland repeatedly denied that the “news reports” that served as the basis for the October 4 memo were not the same news reports referenced in the NSBA letter, despite also referring to the letter to justify the directive to the FBI. Do you apologize to Scott Smith and his 15-year-old daughter, judge?” Cotton asked. “And that man, Scott Smith, because he went to a school board and tried to defend his daughter’s rights, was condemned internationally. She was raped in a bathroom by a boy wearing girl’s clothes and the Loudoun County school board covered it up because it would’ve interfered with their transgender policy during Pride Month,” Cotton said toward the end of his roughly 8-minute long round of questioning. That refers to Scott Smith, whose 15-year-old daughter was raped. “You keep citing news reports and that’s the most prominent news report that anyone in America has seen. Cotton pushed the attorney general over the basis for the memo, which Garland has justified by pointing to “news reports” and a September letter from the National School Boards Association. Tom Cotton (R-AR) blistered Attorney General Merrick Garland, telling the Biden administration cabinet official he should “resign in disgrace” for directing the FBI to investigate and potentially crack down on “parents at school board meetings.”Ĭotton questioned Garland over the October 4 memo during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |